The resolution did not pass
Total votes
against: 55
in favor:25
abstain: 17
The delegate of Czech Republic delivers the closing speech
17:12
The delegate of Belgium delivers the speech against the resolution
17:09
The floor for open debate questions has closed
17:09
A delegate from the committee responded
17:07
The delegate of Germany was wondering how the OC 3 brings any solution to the problem
17:07
The delegate of Czech Republic responded
17:04
A delegate asked about OC 1
17:03
The delegate of Bulgaria responded
17:02
The delegate of Poland asked about OC 7
17:01
The delegate of Czech Republic responded
16:58
The delegate of Malta asked about OC 4 and the type of mechanismes used
16:56
The delegate of Hellas responded
16:53
The delegate of Lithuania askes about OC 14 whilw mentioning the current work application process
16:51
The delegate of Czech Republic responded
16:49
The delegate fo Slovenia asked about OC 11
16:48
The delegate of Hellas responded explaining the situation
16:45
The delegate of Estonia asked about OC 21
16:43
The delegate of Belgium responded
16:42
The delegate of Australia requestes for examples
16:42
The delegate of Belgium responded explaining the issue
16:41
The delegate of Australia asked about OC 17
16:41
The floor has opened for open debate questions
16:39
The amendment did not pass
Total votes
against: 79
in favor: 17
16:30
The delegate of Montenegro delivers the speech in response to the amendment
16:27
The delegate of Slovakia responded positively
16:23
The delegate of Hellas was wondering whether the delegate of Slovakia is aware that a microchip already exists
16:21
The delegate of Slovakia delivers the amendment speech
16:20
The amendment of the delegate of Slovakia regarding OC 23 was chosen
16:19
A delegate from the committee responded
16:18
The delegate of Austria was wondering was the committee could imply by new R&D (OC 9)
16:18
A delegate from the committee responded
16:16
The delegate of Hungary asked about OC 23
16:14
A delegate from the committee responded
16:14
A delegate from the committee requestes some examples for OC 5
16:13
The delegate of Czech Republic responded
16:12
The delegate of Denmark asked about OC 5
16:11
The floor has opened for factual questions
16:11
The delegate of Finland delivers the opening speech
16:08
The delegate of Austria reads out the OCs
16:01
Moving on to the ECON/DEVE committee
15:53
The resolution did not pass with 40 votes for 43 against ans 14 abstainsions
15;48
The delegate of Malta delivered the closing speech
15;41
The floor closed for open debate questions
INTA AFET expained their oc
15;34
The delegate of Norway asked a question on oc 3
15;34
INTA AFET answered briefly
15;34
The delegate of the UK asked a question on oc 20
15;33
INTA AFET gave some more info on the oc
15;30
The delegate of Italy asked a question on oc 12
15;30
INTA AFET cleared up the delegates confusion
15;27
The delegate of Poland asked a question about oc4
15;26
INTA AFET explained part of their oc to answer his question
15;24
The delegate of Germany asked a question on oc 11
15;23
INTA AFET explained why they want to lessen connections with china
15;22
The delegate of Malta asked a question on oc 18
15;21
INTA AFET defended their oc
15;18
A Greek delegate of asked a question on oc 18
15;17
INTA AFET explained the resolution further
15;15
The delegate of Denmark asked a question on oc 15
15;14
The floor opened for open debate questi0ns
15;14
The amendment passed with, 55 votes for and 43 votes against
The delegate of UK delivered the response to the amendment speech
15;14
15;08
The floor closed for factual questions
The delegate of Norway explained the definition of espionage
15;07
A delegate of the committe stated that the amendment maker did not understand the oc correctly
15;07
The delegate wh0 proposed the amendment once again explained the resolution further
15;06
The delegate of Belgum asked a question
15:05
The delegate who suggested the amendment explained the amendment further
15;04
The delegate of Montenegro asked a quesstion
15;04
The floor was opened for questions for the amendment
15;03
The amendment speech was delivered by the delegate of Austria on oc 13
15:01
The floor was closed for factual questions
15:00
INTA/AFET gave a brief explaination of the oc
15;00
The delegate of Bulgaria asked a question on oc 14
15;00
INTA AFET explained the oc further
14;58
The delegate of Slovenia asked a question on oc 10
INTA AFET clarified what sub oc 3 was
14;57
The delegate of Poland asked a question on OC 11
INTA AFET explained the principals
14;55
The delegate of Finland asked a question on oc 20
14;54
INTA AFET explained the oc
14;54
A belgian delegate asked a question on oc 9
14:54
The floor was opened for factual questions
14:53
The delegate of Netherlands delivered the opening speech
14;51
The floor was opened for factual questions
14:50
A delegate from the commitee read out the oc’s
14;42
Some textual changes were made
14;42
Moving on to the INTA AFET resolution
14;21
The GA is having some technical issues
14;20
The resolution passed!
Total votes
against: 30
in favor: 42
abstain: 24
13:5
A delegate delivers the closing speech
13:43
The delegate of UK delivers the speech against the resolution
13:42
The delegate of Netherlands responded
13:41
The delegate of Estonia asked a question regarding OC 16
13:40
The delegate of Malta responded
13:39
The delegate of Norway asked about OC 8
13:38
The delegate of Norway resopnded
13:36
The delegate of Finalnd asked about OC 11
13:34
The delegate of Norway responded by explaining the objective of these bodies
13:33
The delegate of Australia asked about OC 9
13:32
The delegate of Slovakia responded
13:31
The delegate of Austria was wondering how the committee proposes to prevemt the potential misuse of the policy
13:30
The delegate of Malta responded
13:30
The delegate of Belgium accepted the follow up proposed by the presidency
13:29
The delegate of Lituania responded by explaining the OC
13:28
The delegate of Belgium asked about OC 10
13:27
The delegate of Spain responded
13:27
The delegate of Turkey requested more information about OC 1
13:26
The delegate of Malta responded by clarifying the differnt focus between the first and the second OC
13:25
The delegate of Turkey was wondering about the same OC, while mentioning OC 2
13:24
The delegate of Spain responded by explaining how such a solution is beneficial
13:23
The delegate of Estonia asked about OC 1
13:23
The delegate is not directly connected to OC 3, helps independent media from going bankrupt
13:22
The delegate of Netherlands asked another question about the same OC
13:21
The delegate of Netherlands from the committee responded by mentioning OC 13
13:21
The delegate of Netherlands asked about OC 3
13:19
The delegate of Turkey responded by clarifying the meaning of the solution
13:19
The delegate of Lithuania asked about OC 2
13:18
The amendment did not pass
Total votes
against: 69
in favor: 27
13:17
The delegate of Italy delivers the speech in response to the amendment
13:13
The delegate of Bulgaria responded that this is irrelevant
13:12
A delegate from Czech Republic asked the delegate of Bulgaria whether he would agree with regulations on social media concerning vulgar
13:11
The delegate of Bulgaria responded
13:10
The delegate of Lithuania asked for clarification on the amendment
13:09
The delegate of Bulgaria responded adequately
13:08
The delegate from Australia asked the reason why the delegate of Bulgaria opts to strike the OC
13:08
The delegate of Bulgaria delivers the amendment speech
13:05
The amendment of the delegate of Bulgaria from the committee AFET regarding OC 14 was chosen
13:05
A delegate from the committee answered by explaining the criterias
13:04
A delegate asked about OC 12
13:04
The delegate of Turkey briefly explained the meaning
13:03
A delegate asked for some clarification on OC 9
13:03
A delegate from the committee answered
13:03
The delegate of Poland asked about OC 11, subclause 5
13:02
The delegate of Italy responded
13:01
The delegate of Hellas asked what the better helping program does (OC 2)
13:00
The delegate of Sweden delivers the opening speech
12:56
The delegate of Malta reads out the OCs
12:49
Moving on to the JURI committee
The resolution did not pass
Total votes
against: 41
in favor: 38
abstain: 17
12:14
The delegate of Bulgaria delivers the closing speech
12:06
The delegate of Lithuania delivers the speech against the resolution
12:01
The delegate of Australia responded
12:01
The delegate of Turkey asked about OC 19
12:00
A delegate from the committee responded
11:58
The delegate was wondering how the committee would manage this (OC 27)
11:58
A delegate from the committee responded
11:56
The delegtate of Italy asked about OC 12
11:56
A delegate from the committee rersponded
11:54
The delegate of Netherlands
11:54
A delegate from the committee rersponded
11:52
The delegate of Demark asked about OC 17
11:52
A delegate from the committee rersponded
11:48
The delegate of Germany asked about OC 15
11:47
A delegate from the committee rersponded
11:46
The delegate of Hellas about OC 18 and its contribution in reconstructing Ukraine
11:45
A delegate from the committee responded
11:44
The delegate of Slovenia asked about OC 18 and reconsidering museums
11:43
The delegate of Denmark responded by explaining the goal of that OC
11:42
The delegate of Spain was wondering about OC 20
11:41
A delegate from the committee reposned by explaining this is not the only solution
11:38
The delegate of Australia asked about OC 24
11:36
The amendment did not pass
Total votes
against: 85
in favor: 11
The delegate of Cyprus delivers the speech in response to the amendment
11:30
The delegate of Cyrpus responded
11:28
The delegate of Hellas asked about the amendment
11:27
The delegate 0f Cyprus responded by calrifying a part of her amendment
11:26
The delegate of Czech Republic accepted the follow up proposed by the presidency
11:25
The delegate of Cyprus repsonded
11:24
The delegate of Czech Republic asked about the amendment
11:23
The delegate of Cyprus delivers the amendment speech
11:21
The amendment of the delegate of Cyprus regarding OC 5 was chosen
11:21
A delegate from the committee explained both the meaning and the purpose
11:19
The delegate of Slovenia was curious if the committee could explain what they mean by harmonized EU standards
11:19
The delegate of Australia responded
11:18
The delegate of Austria asked about OC 22
11:17
The delegate of Cyprus responded
11:16
The delegate of Finland aksed about OC 24
11:15
The floor has opened for factual questions
11:15
The delegate of Hellas delivers the opening speech
11:12
The delegate of Estonia reads out the OCs
11:04
Moving on to the AFET resolution
11:03
The resolution has passed
10:56
The delegate of Spain delivered the closing speech
10;50
The delegate Norway of delivered the speech against the resolution
10;48
SEDE explained how the ai will work
10:46
The delegate of Montenegro asked a question on oc 22
SEDE explained the law
10:43
The delegate ofGermany asked a question on oc 3
10:43
SEDE gave some more info on their oc
10;41
The delegate of Sweden asked a question on oc 16
SEDE explained how the network will work
10;40
The delegate of Finland asked a quesstion on oc 7
SEDE how their resolution is effective
10:39
The delegate of Belgium asked a question on oc7
10;39
SEDE explained their oc more
1o:36
The delegate of The Netherlands asked a question on oc 13
SEDE explained how the guidlines will benefit the EU
10;35
The delegate of Cyprus asked a question on oc 9
SEDE gave some more details about this oc
10:32
The delegate of Turkiye asked a question on oc 9
SEDE explained some infoo about their oc that might have been misubderstood
10:29
The delegate of Lithuania asked a question on oc 17
SEDE explained why the committe created new info instead of using current info
10:27
The delegate of Norway asked a questiob on oc 8
SEDE explained their oc further
10;25
The delegate of Germaanny asked a question on oc 8
SEDE expplained their oc further
10;24
The delegate of Austria asked a question on oc 4
SEDE explained how the data will be protected
10:18
The delegate of Sweden asked a question on oc 6
SEDE explained how this oc will protect the EU better
10:17
The delegate of Greece asked aa question on oc 6
SEDE explained the oc further
10:16
A delegate asked a question on oc 6
10;16
The floor opened on open debate question
10:15
The amendment did not pass, with 33 votes for, 64 votes against
10:12
The delegate of Norway delivered the speech against the amendment
10;10
The delegate that suggested the amendment how companies use fire walls
10:09
The delegate of Poland asked a question
10;08
The delegate that suggested the amendment explained how the oc is vague
10:07
The delegate of Beligium asked a question
10:06
The amendment maker explained how a fire wall is a military weapon
10:06
The delegate of Greece asked a questiom
10;06
The floor openned for some amendment questions
10:05
The delegate of the Czech republic delivered the amendment speech
10;02
The floor closed for factual questions
10;01
SEDE explained tracking the digital componennts
10:01
The delegate of Estonia asked a question on oc 16
10:00
SEDE replied by further explaining oc7
10;00
The delegate of Montenegro asked a question on oc 7
10;00
SEDE replied by giving a definition of quantom cryptography
9:58
The delegate of UK asked about oc 1
9;58
The floor for factual questions opened
9:56
A delegate delivered the opening speech
9:53
A delegate read out the oc’s
9:47
The presidency announced some textual changes
9:45
We started of with the SEDE committee
9:43
Everybody is seated and ready to begin
9:33
GENERAL ASSEMBLY DAY 2 HAS STARTED
GENERAL ASSEMBLY DAY 1 HAS ENDED
The resolution did not pass
Total votes
against: 51
in favor: 28
abstain: 18
17:15
The closing speech was delivered by the delegate Czech republic
17:10
The delegate of Denmark delivered the speech against the resolution
17;07
The committee cleared up some of the confusion of their resolution through open debate questions
17;05
The delegate of UK was wondering how will the EU monitor and oversee these systems (OC 2)
A member of the committee responded
16:48
An italian delegate asked some questions to the LIBE/JURI
16:46
The delegate of Austria clarified some questions that were about the same subject
16;44
The amendment did not pass with 38 votes for and 59 against
16;40
A delegate made a speech again the amendment
16;35
The delegate making the amendment explaineed his reasons once again
16:30
The delegate of montenegro questioned the deletion of this amendment
The floor was opened for questions
16:27
A delegate from JURI LIBE delivered the amendment speech
JURI/LIBE They replied by explaining that its a digital id
16;24
The delegation of norway asked what a eu identity card was
16;22
JURI/LIBE explained teh definition
16;23
The delegate of Cyprus asked what type of extension the NAS is
JURI/LIBE replied to him by explaining how the process works
16:20
The delegate of Greece asked a factual question
The delegate of Denmark delivered the opening
speech
14:14
A delegate of the committee read the oc’s out
14;09
A textual change took place
16;07
Moving on to LIBE/JURI
The resolution has passed!
Total votes
against: 36
in favor: 51
abstain: 9
15:56
The delegate of Bulgaria delivers the closing speech
15:49
The delegate of Hellas delivers the speech against the resolution
15:46
The delegate of Denmark explained the meaning of this solution
15:45
The delegate of Netherlands asked about OC 9
15:45
The delegate of Czech Republic responded
15:44
The delegate of Slovakia asked whether this additional personnal will work with those who have disabilities
15:43
A delegate of the committee responded by explaining their proposal
15:41
The delegate of Germany was wondering where will the personal come from (OC 1)
15:40
A delegate of the committee responded
15:39
The delegate of Italy why approved the institution to be responsible for the funding
15:38
A delegate of the committee responded
15:36
The delegate of Denmark asked why the private sector could be interested in doing so (OC 6)
15:34
A delegate of the committee responded negatively
15:33
The delegate Sweden was wondering if the teachers will be educating based on their preferences
15:33
A delegate of the committee answered by explaining it will ameliorate teachers
15:32
The delegate of Sweden asked for the meaning of OC 3, subclause 1
15:32
The delegate of Australia responded
15:32
The delegate of Finland was wondering whether the students will end up following such a career that they are not intrerested in
15:32
The delegate of Cyprus provided an answer
15:30
The delegate of Slovenia asked for clarification on OC 10
15:28
A member of the committee responded
15:27
The delegate of Spain asked about OC 14
15:27
The floor has opened for open debate questions
15:26
Total votes
against: 61
in favor: 35
the amendment has not passed
15:2
They are voting
15:20
The delegate of Denmark delivers the speech in response to the amendment
15:19
The delegate of UK responded
15:18
The delegate of Montenegro was wondering why thr sublause is referring to generative AI
15:18
The delegate of UK responded
15:17
The delegate of Turkey asked about the reliability
15:16
The delegate of the UK delivers the amendment speech
15:12
The amendment of the delegate of UK from the committee on INTA/AFET regarding OC 3, subclause 2 was chosen
15:11
The delegate of Denmark responded
15:11
The delegate of Hungary was wondering what the committee considers inspirational teachers (OC 11)
15:10
The delegate of Montenegro responded
15:09
The delegate of Poland inquired for elaboration on oc 1
15:08
This question was not accepted by the presidency since it is not a factual one
The delegate of Belgium asked about oc 8, subclause 1
15:06
The delegate of Austria responded
15:05
The delegate of Germany asked for clarification regarding OC 8
15:04
The delegate of Australia delivers the opening speech
15:01
The delegate of Hellas reads out the OCs
14:56
Moving on to the CULT committee
14:53
The cp’s dissaproved of the resolution because they renewed their onlyfans subscription yestarday
14:52
The resolution did not pass with 28 votes for,55 votes against and 13 abstensions
14:51
The delegate of UK Delivered the closing speech
14;44
The delegate of Austria dellivered it
14:40
The G.A. continued by moving to the speech against the resolution
14;40
FEMM replied by explaining how social media will complete this oc without violating human rights 14;37
Lastly the delegate of Turkey questioned oc no. 8
14;36
FEMM replied by directing the UK to a part of their resolution where they answer his question
14:33
The delegate of UK asked a question on OC 15
The presidency denied his question because it was factual
14;32
The delegate of Ukraine asked a question regarding OC 15
14:32
1The presidency rejected his question after asking for a rephrazal many times
14:30
Germany also asked a question on OC 1
14:29
FEMM answered their question by explaining the specific steps they will take to complete this operational clause
14:27
The delegate of Spain asked about OC no.1
14:26
FEMM explained all the diffrences of the oc’s
14;25
The delegate o Australia asked how oc 1 is diffrent from OC 14
14:24
FEMM ANSWERED that the delegates will be chosen and trained from professinals
14;24
The delegate of Estonia aske about how will the delegates will be chosen
14:23
FEMM replied that they believe that theirn OC will nbe succesfull and gave examples ofnotheer situation that this worked
14:22
The delegate of Finland asked a question on OC no. 7
FEMM replied that their goal as a committee is to lessen online abuse
14:20
The delegate of Sweden asked a question on oc 9
14:20
FEMM replied no 14:18
The delegate of Cyprus asked a question on if there are social media without guidlines
14:17
FEMM replied that media companies will control the guidlines of the collaboration
14:17
The delegate of Bulgaria also asked a question on OC 10
FEMM stated that media influencers will help if they learn about the FEMM issues
The delegate of Spain asked about clause 1o
14:16
The delegates moved to the open debate
14:14
The amendment did not pass with, 23 votes for,with 74 votes against
The delegates moved to vote on the amendment
14:10
The delegate of Norway delivered the speech against the amendment
14:07
FEMM gave an explaination on how that would happen
14:06
The delegate of Slovakia asked how can we be sure that social media managers will respect the privacy of users on the annual report
14:05
The delegate of Cyprus clarifed who she believes is a social media managment
14:04
The delegate of Greece asked wh0 the FEMM committee thinks is a social media managment
14:04
The floor opened for questions regarding the amendment
14:02
The delegate of Cyprous delivered the amendment speech on OC 13
14:00
FEMM answered that Experts will decide
13:59
Finally Lithuania asked if experts would provide subsities or provide
13:58
The delegate of the UK answered the question
13;57
The delegate of the Czech republic asked Who is the private sector on oc 8 13
13:55
The delegate Sweeden replied that socal media will be avoiding it
13:55
A delegate asked the FEMM commitee who will be avoiding penalisation on oc 5
13:54
The delegate of the UK gave the necessary info to answer the question
13:53
The delegate of Montenegro asked about point 16
13:52
The floor opened for factual questions
13:51
The delegate of Sweden delivered the opening speech
1:48
A member of the FEMM (Malta) committee read out their resolution
1:43
Moving on to the FEMM committee
13:36
Total votes
against: 49
in favor: 36
abstain: 10
the resolution did not pass
12:52
They are voting on the resolution
12:48
The delegate of Italy delivers the closing speech
12:44
The delegate of Czech Republic delivers the speech against the resolution
12:40
The delegate of Netherlands responded clarifying their goal regarding this OC
12:39
The delegate of Austria asked a question about OC 14
12:28
A delegate from the committee responded explaining the meaning of the OC
12:37
The delegate of Australia was wondering how checks and balances will be reinforced (OC 10)
12:37
The delegate of Italy responded
12:35
The delegate of Slovenia asked about the same OC
12:34
The delegate of Norway responded
12:34
A delegate asked about OC 13
12:33
The delegate of Italy explained the subcluase
12:32
The delegate of Turkey asked about OC 8, subclause 3
12:31
The delegate of Spain responded
12:30
The delegate of Slovakia asked about OC 8
12:29
The delegate of Malta responded
12:29
The delegate of Estonia was wondering why implementing such systems if the committee is not sure about their efficiency
12:28
The delegate of Spain responded
12:27
The delegate of Hellas asked a question regarding OC 16, the correlation between food protection security and data privacy procedures
12:26
A delegate from the committee responded clarifying that competition is necessary
12:25
A delegate from Lithuania whether such a solution promotes competition among farmers
12:24
A delegate from the committee responded
12:23
The delegate of Bulgaria asked a question about small farms being helped by big farms without expecting anything in return
12:22
The delegate of Netherlands responded
12:22
The delagate of Belgium asked an open debate question regarding OC 7
12:21
The amendment has passed
12:20
Total votes
against: 26
in favor: 67
12:19
They are voting for the amendment
12:11
The delegate of Norway delivers the speech in response to the amendment
12:11
The delegate of Hungary responded
12:10
The delegate of Estonia required the goal of the amendment proposed
12:08
The delagate of Hungray delivers the amendment speech
12:06
The amendment of the delegate of Hungary from committee on TRAN regarding OC 2 was chosen
12:05
The delegate of Malta answered
12:04
The committe was asked about OC 2 by a delegate
12:03
The delegate of Spain aswered
12:02
The committe was asked about OC 6 by a delegate
12:02
The delegate of Italy answered
12:01
The committe was asked about OC 14 by a delegate
12:00
The floor has opened for factual questions
11:58
A delegate from the committee on AGRI (Spain) delivers the opening speech
11:54
A delegate from the committee on AGRI (UK) reads out the OCs
11:48
The resolution passed
The resolution with, votes against 36, 47 votes in favor, and 13 abstainsions
11:44
The delegate of Bulgaria delivered the closing speech
11:34
The open debate portion of TRAN’s discussion ended and the delegate of Australlia delivered the speech against the resolution
11:31
TRAN proposed safe transportation methods for hydrogen
11:29
he delegate of Cyprus claimed that hydrogen could not be transported
11:29
TRAN defended their oc by claiming that its fullproof
11:28
The delegate of Italy questioned oc 11 and stated that its not efficient
11:27
TRAN defended their answer succesfully
11:26
The delegate of Italy asked about oc number 2 and its practicability
11:25
TRAN defended the adoption of the Euro seven emission standards
11:23
The delegate of Turkey put into question OC 15
11:22
TRAN explained how its useful for citizens that want to be more eco friendly
11:21
The delegate of Poland asked how jobs in the public transportation sector relevant to their resolution 11:19
TRAN proved that their clause is useful
11:18
delegate questioned the efficiency of the clause
11:17
TRAN explained that their committee’s clause is complete and explained it with more info
11:17
The delegate of UK made a statment that oc 9 was n0t complete
11:16
The committee explained how fossil fuel will be used but on a lesser level
11:15
The delegation of Lithuania followed up by saying they dont see the relevance of phasing out the use of fossil fuel
11:14
The committee was asked to explain their answer on oc 6 by the delegate of lithuania
11:12
The committee on TRAN answered 3 questions about OC no. 7
11:09
Open debate has started
11:08
total votes
against:49
in favor:36
the amendment did not pass
11:07
The delegation of Hungary are having technical issues
11:05
They are voting for the amendment
11:o1
The delegate of Cyprus made the speech against the amendment
10:59
He explained that the whole OC was flawed
10:58
Lastly he was asked why he wanted to delete the whole OC instead of changing the flawed part
10:58
The delegate explained his opinion once again
10:56
He was also asked why the delegate believed the OC was not good
10:55
The delegate was asked to elaborate on a part of his speech
10:54
The amendment speech was given by a member of the ECON/DEVE (Greece) committee
10:53
An amendment was prooposed on OC 10 by the delegate of Greece
10:50
The factual questions portion ended
10:49
The delegate of Cyprus asked for a clarification on oc 16
10:48
The representative answered
The delegate of sweden asked about OC 13
10:47
The representative answered
10:47
The delegate was asked about OC 5
10:46
The delegates move onto the factual question part of assesing the TRAN committee’s resolution
10:44
A delegate from TRAN(Germany) delivers the opening speech
10:42
A member of the committe of TRAN (Denmark) reads out their oc’s
10:36
The committees presenting today are: TRAN,AGRI, FEMM, CULT, LIBE/JURI
10:32
The G.A. commences with a speech from the presidency
10:31
A board member gives some info aswell
10:23
The president of the G.A. gives a brief about it
10:22
Everybody is seated and ready to begin
10:20
The delegates are coming into the auditorium.
10:03
The General Assembly is about to start. VPs are preparing.
9:40